Thursday, July 28, 2011

China’s toxic industrial waste is disposed of through Australia’s drinking water.

So what can we say to the Queensland Premier? Only one simple sentence: "Shame on you Anna Bligh!" The following (see below) was sent to all politicians in Queensland, by Colin Bishop, who is a resident of Mundubbera, Qld. (Click on picture to enlarge.) 

Please send this on to your friends; they need to know the truth before the next state election. Colin has a Diploma in Biochemic Medicine and is ardently against compulsory water fluoridation. Whether the politicians will read it and take notice is another matter.  Let’s hope that prior to the next election they will take their blinkers off and their ear plugs out. This is of course wishful thinking on my part.  However, we will continue in the meantime to elucidate the fluoride deception for the Australian people.

It is unmistakably and visibly clear that our politicians, government health bureaucrats and most of our dentists take their ethics from the work manual of the Nazis, which is: tell the population only what you want them to know, treat them like mushrooms and feed them BS.

 * * * * *
I quote, Colin Bishop.

You still insist on poisoning my water with silicofluoride? Watch these four videos and then ask yourself “is water fluoridation a wise decision?” If you believe that it is wise then I would ask you “who is telling you” and what material are they showing you? Are you sure that it “will do no harm” – to anyone or anything!

Also take into account that this is a cumulative poison – it builds up! The only way to excrete this poison from your body is through the kidneys – it should be worrying you as 1 in 3 Australians are at risk of developing a kidney disease and the rate of diabetes is growing as fast as cancer!


Professional Perspectives: Fluoride in Tap Water

Australia's Industrial Fluoridation Disgrace, an Australian documentary.

This could be your last wake-up call before the next election – stick with Bligh and Jeannette Young at your peril! This wakeup call could be your last before the Fluoridegate starts to look for those responsible. There is no law that can protect you from litigation if you have acted negligently, you must consider both side of fluoride issue not just what the government want you to vote for.

Ask yourself why just about everyone in the Queensland parliament voted against the compulsory introduction of fluoride back in 2004 – and then would you consider why the whole of the government changed their minds? Most speakers in 2004 pointed out that it was wrong and unethical to mass medicate public water supplies, and the LGAQ still maintain this perspective, so what information were you given that made you vote for it in 2008??

* * * * * *
Incredible Documentation Indicating Suppression of Safety Information – hiding the truth.

According to the Fluoride Action Network:

"Law firms are now reviewing old and new documents believed to highlight a pattern of attempts to curtail discussions on fluoride toxicity and downplay the importance of professionals personally reviewing scientific reports about fluorides… One such document is an explosive transcript of a 1951 meeting of state dental directors on file at the Library of Congress."

In this meeting, state dental leaders were told:

"The question of toxicity is on the same order. Lay off it altogether. Just pass it over. 'We know there is absolutely no effect other than reducing tooth decay,' you say, and go on. If it becomes an issue, then you will have to take it over, but don't bring it up yourself."

Additionally, a white paper issued by the American Dental Association in 1979 states:

"Individual dentists must be convinced that they need not be familiar with scientific reports of laboratory and field investigations on fluoridation to be effective participants in the promotion program and that nonparticipation is an overt neglect of professional responsibility."

Fluoride Action Network quotes Daniel G. Stockin, a career public health professional opposed to water fluoridation:

"I think it's pretty clear that the public, the media, and health providers were given soothing talking points about fluoridation, and in many cases dissuaded from personally looking at toxicity data.

How can CDC oral health professionals in a department that has promoted fluoridation for decades be objective, let alone competent to assess research and draw conclusions about the toxicity of fluorides on thyroid glands, kidneys, and the pineal gland?

There is a reason we're seeing calls for Fluoridegate investigations. The legal community and the media are waking up to this. I believe jurors will see a clear pattern of disinformation, half-truths, misdirection, and omission of critical material facts concerning harm from fluoridated drinking water."

I can’t see how the premier can give you any indemnity if you have been lying? Can you? Colin Bishop. Unquote.

My thought for today. – Werner

"WE the people are putting our elected leaders on notice... if you abuse your power and do not govern "for the people, by the people and accountable to the people"  WE will elect honourable leaders who will!" - Colin Bishop

Saturday, July 16, 2011

Who is the world's biggest polluter on this planet?

The Answer is: The USA Defence force, but they are not subject to a carbon tax. (Read more about it below) Australia is a small fish in a big pool of polluters, yet we are lumbered with a carbon tax and the big fish keep on polluting without such an impost. Imposing a carbon tax on Australian industry will have as little effect on the climate as revenue raising by the police for speeding will have on crime, which is zero.

The majority of Australians are totally opposed to this tax impost.  The strong feeling against the Gillard government is widespread and is expressed in opinion polls, in newspaper articles and in letters to the editor. Bill Schutz, of Mt Sheridan/Cairns wrote the following letter in today’s “The Cairns Post,” his opinion would also be the majority view of Australians. I quote:

* * * * * * * * *
Carbon plan just another debacle.
I DOUBT this mighty country has ever had such an incompetent Federal Government as it has right now. The bungling of nearly every situation that has come across the PM's desk is simply mind boggling.

Whether it be the East Timor solution, the Malaysian solution, the Building the Education Revolution, pink batts, the live cattle trade debacle, the list is simply endless. And now for the big one, the carbon tax, the tax we were never going to have under a government she led.

Australia is 1.4 per cent of total world CO2 output, in an environment where only 0.0384 per cent of total atmosphere is made up of CO2. The miniscule amount of difference Australia would make is negligible and not worth the pain of this huge tax impost on to our society.The biggest change to Australian business in our history is about to be pushed on to us and we did not even have a chance to vote on it. This is a disgrace and the ALP should hang their heads in shame at the damage they have inflicted on us hard working Australians. God help Australia because nothing can help this ALP Government win the next election. Unquote

Following are some excerpts from an interesting exposé of the US Department of Defence; accused of being the worst polluter on the planet. Yet the Gillard government and its motley crew of greens and independents want to penalise us for the minute amount we produce in Australia. To read the full exposé, click here. - Werner
* * * * * * * * *
The US military is responsible for the most egregious and widespread pollution of the planet, yet this information and accompanying documentation goes almost entirely unreported. In spite of the evidence, the environmental impact of the US military goes largely unaddressed by environmental organizations and was not the focus of any discussions or proposed restrictions at the UN Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen. This impact includes uninhibited use of fossil fuels, massive creation of greenhouse gases, and extensive release of radioactive and chemical contaminants into the air, water, and soil.

The extensive global operations of the US military (wars, interventions, and secret operations on over one thousand bases around the world and six thousand facilities in the United States) are not counted against US greenhouse gas limits. Sara Flounders writes, “By every measure, the Pentagon is the largest institutional user of petroleum products and energy in general. Yet the Pentagon has a blanket exemption in all international climate agreements.”

While official accounts put US military usage at 320,000 barrels of oil a day, that does not include fuel consumed by contractors, in leased or private facilities, or in the production of weapons. The US military is a major contributor of carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas that most scientists believe is to blame for climate change. Steve Kretzmann, director of Oil Change International, reports, “The Iraq war was responsible for at least 141 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (MMTCO2e) from March 2003 through December 2007. . . . That war emits more than 60 percent that of all countries. . . . This information is not readily available . . . because military emissions abroad are exempt from national reporting requirements under US law and the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change.”

According to Barry Sanders, author of The Green Zone: The Environmental Costs of Militarism, “the greatest single assault on the environment, on all of us around the globe, comes from one agency . . . the Armed Forces of the United States.”

Throughout the long history of military preparations, actions, and wars, the US military has not been held responsible for the effects of its activities upon environments, peoples, or animals. During the Kyoto Accords negotiations in December 1997, the US demanded as a provision of signing that any and all of its military operations worldwide, including operations in participation with the UN and NATO, be exempted from measurement or reductions.

After attaining this concession, the Bush administration then refused to sign the accords and the US Congress passed an explicit provision guaranteeing the US military exemption from any energy reduction or measurement.

Environmental journalist Johanna Peace reports that military activities will continue to be exempt based on an executive order signed by President Barack Obama that calls for other federal agencies to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions by 2020. Peace states, “The military accounts for a full 80 percent of the federal government’s energy demand.” 
As it stands, the Department of Defence is the largest polluter in the world, producing more hazardous waste than the five largest US chemical companies combined. Depleted uranium, petroleum, oil, pesticides, defoliant agents such as Agent Orange, and lead, along with vast amounts of radiation from weaponry produced, tested, and used, are just some of the pollutants with which the US military is contaminating the environment.

- Depleted uranium: Tens of thousands of pounds of micro particles of radioactive and highly toxic waste contaminate the Middle East, Central Asia, and the Balkans.
- US-made land mines and cluster bombs spread over wide areas of Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East continue to spread death and destruction even after wars have ceased.

- Thirty-five years after the Vietnam War, dioxin contamination is three hundred to four hundred times higher than “safe” levels, resulting in severe birth defects and cancers into the third generation of those affected.

- US military policies and wars in Iraq have created severe desertification of 90 percent of the land, changing Iraq from a food exporter into a country that imports 80 percent of its food. 

The source: Project Censored, media democracy in action. To read the full article, click here.
* * * * * * * *
My thought for today. - Werner

Money talks - but credit has an echo.
Bob Thaves

Saturday, July 9, 2011

To have a flu shot or not, that is the question.

Whether to have a flu injection is of course the choice of the individual. The federal government has spent millions of dollars on the vaccine, which has a use by date, and consequently uses the doctors to encourage you to get immunized. However, before you decide; read the following article by Tony Isaacs.

My wife and I have now refused to have a flu injection for three consecutive years, on the basis of what we have read from trustworthy and honest sources and – we didn’t get the flu. However our last flu shot made us very sick.

Also see:
1. "How to Beat and Avoid the Flu." Click here.

2."Build a Good Natural Foundation for the Best Health and Longevity. Click here."

3. Vitamin D more effective than vaccines at preventing flu infections. Click here.

You will learn more about the author at the end of his article. - Werner
* * * * * * *
Swine Flu Scam Continues for 2011, Exposing Elderly and Others to Needless Risks. By Tony Isaacs.

The great Swine Flu hoax marches on, once again putting our elderly and other vulnerable people at unnecessary risk for the sake of greed and profits. While the World Health Organization officially declared the end of the H1N1 pandemic-that-never-was, the untested H1N1 swine flu vaccine is being included in this year's annual flu jab the same as it was in 2010.

Flu shots usually have questionable benefits and the risk of potentially harmful side effects in the first place. The decision to include the H1N1 vaccine will result in even greater risks to large numbers of vulnerable people – including the elderly, those with heart disease and chest problems, and diabetics. The vaccine has never been properly tested and it continues to contain mercury (in the multi-dose vial versions). In 2009, key workers who were vaccinated against the supposed swine flu pandemic reported having headaches, sleeplessness and stomach cramps.

The ingredients in this year's flu shots:
• Egg proteins - including avian contaminant viruses
• Gelatin - known to cause allergic reactions and anaphylaxis are usually associated with sensitivity to egg or gelatin
• Polysorbate 80 (Tween80™) - can cause severe allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis
• Formaldehyde - a known carcinogen
• Triton X100: a strong detergent
• Sucrose - table sugar
• Resin - known to cause allergic reactions
• Gentamycin - an antibiotic
• Thimerosal - mercury is still in multidose vials

Last year, a study in the September 8 issue of the Journal of American Medical Association suggested that the 2009 H1N1 flu virus had lower risk of most serious complications compared to recent seasonal flu strains. The study by Edward A. Belongia, M.D., of the Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation, and colleagues found that the 2009 H1N1 flu did not cause more hospitalizations and pneumonia, which are the most common severe complications of influenza.

Some countries refused and/or denounced the H1N1 vaccine and a report in the British Medical Journal revealed that top scientists who convinced the WHO to declare the pandemic held close financial ties to the drug companies that profited from the sale of those vaccines. Already this year Australia has banned flu vaccines in children after reports of vomiting, fevers and seizure. Finland has also banned H1N1 flu vaccines and Sweden's Medical Products Agency (MPA) is investigating the H1N1 vaccine Pandemrix on the request of the European Commission after it has been linked to narcolepsy in children. In addition to Sweden and Finland, there have also been cases reported in France, Germany, and Norway.

The truth that mainstream medicine and the vaccine makers do not want the public to know is that there are much better and safer natural alternatives for preventing and beating the flu. Eating and living healthily to boost the body's natural first line of defense against the flu and other illnesses is a far better plan than relying on risky and marginally effective flu jabs.

Supplementing during flu season with Vitamin D and other natural immune enhancers, immune modulators and pathogen destroyers can provide even more vital protection against the flu. And, keeping potent anti-virals on hand in case one does catch the flu can help minimize the effects and quickly knock it out.

Superior immune boosters include:

*Oleander extract
*Echinacea (forget the flawed mainstream studies!)
*Pau d’arco
*Medicinal mushrooms
*Beta glucans
*Aloe vera

Superior natural anti-viral pathogen destroyers include:

*Colloidal Silver
*Olive leaf extract
*Oil of wild mountain oregano
*Grapefruit seed extract

Most of us have never been exposed to a Swine or Avian type flu, and thus our bodies have no natural antibodies for such flus. As a result, exposure to such flus runs the risk of causing the release of a cytokine storm which can literally eat up our lungs or drown us. In addition to anti-virals it would also be very wise to also take natural immune modulators to help prevent such a dangerous over- reaction. Notably, vitamin D3 is a strong immune modulator. Others include:

*Magnesium (which most of us are deficient in to begin with)
*Blackseed oil (Nigella sativa)
* * * * * *
About the author.

Tony Isaacs is a natural health advocate and researcher and the author of books and articles about natural health including "Cancer's Natural Enemy". Mr. Isaacs articles are featured at Natural News, the Health Science Institute's Healthiertalk website, CureZone, the Crusador online, AlignLife, the Cancer Tutor, the American Chronicle and several other venues. Mr. Isaacs also has The Best Years in Life website for baby boomers and others wishing to avoid prescription drugs and mainstream managed illness and live longer, healthier and happier lives naturally. In addition, he hosts the Yahoo Oleandersoup Health group of over 2000 members and the CureZone "Ask Tony Isaacs - Featuring Luella May" forum.

* * * * * *
My thought for today. – Werner
A wise man makes his own decisions; an ignorant man follows public opinion. – Chinese proverb.