Monday, July 11, 2016

A handshake, what does mean?

The short answer would be; it would mean different things to different people. Just like handwriting, and how a person shakes a hand can be an indication to their inner nature. Many European countries use the handshake  as a greeting, especially meeting for the first time or after a long absence. When done to the right person, they are perceived as being warm, friendly, trustworthy and honest. In many countries it can also be a greeting, or an act showing that you have made an agreement, in which two people who are facing each other and take hold of and shake each others right hand.

A handshake caused recently a “storm” in Switzerland, and it wasn’t one in a teacup. It was because two Muslim boys refused to shake hands with their female teacher. At first the school authorities granted the boys an exemption. But the Swiss Justice Minister overturned the decision. You just have to admire the Swiss and its justice minister, for not buckling under to demands of minorities that wanted to stop their long held customs, because it is offensive for them that male and females shake hands. The question begs, why do these people go there and not to a country that is compatible with their outdated culture?
The Swiss say that religious belief is no excuse for refusing to shake a teacher’s hand, authorities in a northern Swiss region have ruled, reversing a school’s decision to grant exemptions for Muslim pupils unwilling to touch the opposite sex.

Parents of pupils who refuse to shake a teacher’s hand at schools in the northern canton of Basel-Country could now face fines of up to 5,000 Swiss francs $6720.00 Aus.)  regional education authorities said. “A teacher has the right to demand a handshake,” they said in a statement.

Don’t you think that it is a pity we do not to have such astute politicians in Australia and not kowtowing to minorities? This needs circulation far and wide! Following is what happened in Switzerland. Werner
What’s in a handshake?
Sometimes it's the little things that are the most telling.   In Switzerland it has long been customary for students to shake the hands of their teachers at the beginning and end of the school day. It's a sign of solidarity and mutual respect between teacher and pupil, one that is thought to encourage the right classroom atmosphere. Justice Minister Simonetta Sommaruga recently felt compelled to further explain that shaking hands was part of Swiss culture and daily life.

And the reason she felt compelled to speak out about the handshake is that two Muslim brothers, aged 14 and 15, who have lived in Switzerland for several years (And thus are familiar with its the conventions) in the town of Therwil, near Basel, refused to shake the hands of their teacher, a woman, because, they claimed, this would violate Muslim teachings that contact with the opposite sex is allowed only with family members.

At first the school authorities decided to avoid trouble, and initially granted the boys an exemption from having to shake the hand of any female teacher. But uproar followed, as Mayor Reto Wolf explained to the BBC: "the community was unhappy with the decision taken by the school. In our culture and in our way of communication a handshake is normal and sends out respect for the other person, and this has to be brought home to the children in school."

Therwil's Educational Department reversed the school's decision, explaining in a statement on May 25 that the school's exemption was lifted because "the public interest with respect to equality between men and women and the integration of foreigners significantly outweighs the freedom of religion." It added that a teacher has the right to demand a handshake. Furthermore, if the students refused to shake hands again "the sanctions called for by law will be applied," which included a possible fine of up to 5,000 dollars.

 This uproar in Switzerland, where many people were enraged at the original exemption granted to the Muslim boys, did not end after that exemption was itself overturned by the local Educational Department. The Swiss understood quite clearly that this was more than a little quarrel over handshakes; it was a fight over whether the Swiss would be masters in their own house, or whether they would be forced to yield, by the granting of special treatment, to the Islamic view of the proper relations between the sexes. It is one battle – small but to the Swiss significant – between arrogant Muslim immigrants and the indigenous Swiss.

Naturally, once the exemption was withdrawn, all hell broke loose among Muslims in Switzerland. The Islamic Central Council of Switzerland, instead of yielding quietly to the Swiss decision to uphold the handshaking custom, criticized the ruling in hysterical terms, claiming that the enforcement of the handshaking is "totalitarian" (!) because its intent is to "forbid religious people from meeting their obligations to God." That, of course, was never the "intent" of the long-standing handshaking custom, which was a nearly-universal custom in Switzerland, and in schools had to do only with encouraging the right classroom atmosphere of mutual respect between instructor and pupil, of which the handshake was one aspect.

The Swiss formulation of the problem – weighing competing claims — will be familiar to Americans versed in Constitutional adjudication. In this case "the public interest with respect to equality" of the sexes and the "integration of foreigners" (who are expected to adopt Swiss ways, not force the Swiss to exempt them from some of those ways) were weighed against the "religious obligations to God" of Muslims, and the former interests found to outweigh the latter.

What this case shows is that even at the smallest and seemingly inconsequential level, Muslims are challenging the laws and customs of the Infidels among whom they have been allowed to settle [i.e., stealth jihad toward Sharia dominance]. Each little victory, or defeat, will determine whether Muslims will truly integrate into a Western society or, instead, refashion that society to meet Muslim requirements.

The handshake has been upheld and, what's more, a stiff fine now will be imposed on those who continue to refuse to shake hands with a female teacher. This is a heartening sign of non-surrender by the Swiss. But the challenges of the Muslims within Europe to the laws and customs of the indigenes have no logical end and will not stop. And the greater the number of Muslims allowed to settle in Europe, the stronger and more frequent their challenges will be. They are attempting not to integrate, but rather to create, for now, a second, parallel society, and eventually, through sheer force of numbers from both migration and by out breeding the Infidels, to fashion not a parallel society but one society — now dominated by Muslim Sharia.

The Swiss handshaking dispute has received some, but not enough, press attention. Presumably, it's deemed too inconsequential a matter to bother with. But the Swiss know better, and so should we. (Yes, so should we! - Werner)

There's an old Scottish saying that in one variant reads: "Many a little makes a mickle." That is, the accumulation of many little things leads to one big thing. That's what's happening in Europe today. This was one victory for the side of sanity, and, there will need to be a great many more. (Three cheers for the Swiss! - Werner)
My thought for today.Werner
You can tell the character of a person by their handshake. Kathy Magliato


True Blue Aussie said...

This is refreshing read. Yes, definitely three cheers for the Swiss politicians for their intestinal fortitude and not buckling under to demands of minorities, who don’t like their customs. I wish we had politicians like those in Australia.

Peter Campion said...

It's good to see the Swiss finally waking from their torpor, but will it be too little too late? Anyone following the issues surrounding African-Americans in the US will be aware that integration has not been achieved even after several generations - and in the vast majority they share the same religion. Muslims will never integrate; put simply, it's against their religion.

Barbara said...

Excellent, Werner!

Worried Australian said...

Thanks, Werner! This post clearly shows the ulterior motives behind the reason Muslims wanting to settle in Christian Western countries. 1. To breed us out and 2. To enforce their Islamic laws on these respective countries. Are our politicians really so ignorant and not seeing what is happening in Europe is going to happen eventually in Australia?

Sassa said...

Common courtesy should be adhered to. As minority wishing to make their home in another country, the culture of the guest country should prevail. On Family Feud one night it was obvious to me that a young boy must have been of that descent - he did not shake hands with a mature lady at the desk. Upon reading a f/b site lately, the answer to a journo asking why do they come if they do not believe in our ways. The mature Islamic man said we go to the Western countries because we are free there. This should be brought up in UK, USA, Australia, European cities. Where there are no go zones which have been zoned purely for this religious culture. It is happening in Australia very widely with more to come.