Sunday, April 2, 2017

A difficult moral conundrum, and dilemma.

Here is some food for thought for you. Africa, it seems, is a basket case. This is an awfully sad story. The summary by Yuri is spot on. And what an interesting insight by Kevin Meyers. - Werner

What a difficult moral conundrum!  On hand the hand, we should do whatever we can to preserve and prolong human life.  On the other hand, we realize that had this happened in any other period of history, these millions would have died instead of being "saved" to live wretched and non-productive lives in their future.  At least that is what is being intimated in this post.  As population increases in the most poverty-stricken countries on earth, the problem of famine, unemployment, poor health conditions, and even the spread of war and disease can become endemic.  How do we deal with current as well as future issues when such conditions arise?  Yuri

Irishman's Insight on Africa.

Kevin Myers (born 30 March 1947) is an Irish journalist and writer. He writes for the Irish edition of the Sunday  Times, having previously been a columnist for the Irish Independent and a former contributor to The Irish Times, where he wrote the "An Irishman's Diary" opinion column several times weekly. Until 2005, he wrote for the UK Sunday Telegraph. His articles criticize left-wing opinion and the "liberal consensus", sometimes incorporating hyperbole, sarcasm and parody. This essay appeared in The Irish Independent:

Somalia is not a humanitarian disaster; it is an evolutionary disaster. The current drought is not the worst in 50 years, as the BBC and all the aid organizations claim. It is nothing compared with the droughts in 1960/61 or 73/74. And there are continuing droughts every 5 years or so. It's just that there are now four times the population; having been kept alive by famine relief, supplied by aid organizations, over the past 50 years… so, of course, the effects of any drought now, is a famine. They cannot even feed themselves in a normal rainfall year.

Worst yet, the effects of these droughts, and poor nutrition in the first three years of a child's life, have a lasting effect on the development of the infant brain, so that if they survive, they will never achieve a normal I.Q.

Consequently, they are selectively breeding a population who cannot be educated, let alone one that is not being educated; a recipe for disaster. We are seeing this impact now, and it can only exacerbate, to the detriment of their neighbours, and their environment as well. This scenario can only end in an even worse disaster; with even more suffering, for those benighted people, and their descendants.

Eventually, some mechanism will intervene, be it war, disease or starvation. So what do we do? Let them starve? What a dilemma for our Judeo/Christian/Islamic ethos; as well as Hindu/Buddhist morality. This is beginning to happen in Kenya, Ethiopia and other countries in Asia, like Pakistan. Is this the beginning of the end of civilisation?

AFRICA is giving nothing to anyone outside of Africa - apart from AIDS and new diseases. Even as we see African states refusing to take action to restore something resembling civilization in Zimbabwe, the begging bowl for Ethiopia is being passed around to us out of Africa, yet again. It is nearly 25 years since the famous “Feed the World” campaign began in Ethiopia, and in that time Ethiopia's population has grown from 33.5 million to 78+ million today. Why on earth should I do anything to encourage further catastrophic demographic growth in that country? Where is the logic? There is none.

To be sure, there are two things saying that logic doesn't count. One is my conscience, and the other is the picture, yet again, of another wide-eyed child, yet again, gazing, yet again, at the camera, which yet again, captures the tragedy of children starving. Sorry. My conscience has toured this territory on foot and financially. Unlike most of you, I have been to Ethiopia; like most of you, I have stumped up the loot to charities to stop starvation there.

The wide-eyed boy-child we saved, 20 years or so ago, is now a low I.Q., AK 47-bearing moron, siring children whenever the whim takes him and blaming the world because he is uneducated, poor and left behind. There is no doubt a good argument why we should prolong this predatory and dysfunctional economic, social and sexual system but I do not know what it is.

There is, on the other hand, every reason not to write a column like this.
It will win no friends and will provoke the self-righteous wrath of, well, the self-righteous hand wringing, letter writing wrathful individuals; a species which never fails to contaminate almost every debate in Irish life with its sneers and its moral superiority. It will also probably enrage some of the finest men in Irish life, like John O'Shea, of Goal; and the Finucane brothers, men whom I admire enormously. So be it.

But, please, please, you self-righteously wrathful, spare me mention of our own Irish Famine with this or that lazy analogy. There is no comparison. Within 20 years of the Famine, the Irish population was down by 30%. Over the equivalent period, thanks to western food, the Mercedes 10-wheel truck and the Lockheed Hercules plane, Ethiopia's population has more than doubled.

Alas, that wretched country is not alone in its madness. Somewhere, over the rainbow, lies Somalia, another fine land of violent, AK 47-toting, khat-chewing, girl-circumcising, permanently tumescent layabouts and housing pirates of the ocean.

Indeed, we now have almost an entire continent of sexually hyperactive, illiterate indigents, with tens of millions of people who only survive because of help from the outside world or allowances by the semi-communist Governments they voted for, money supplied by borrowing it from the World Bank!

This dependency has not stimulated political prudence or common sense. Indeed, voodoo idiocy seems to be in the ascendant, with the president of South Africa being a firm believer in the efficacy of a little tap water on the post-coital penis as a sure preventative against AIDS infection. Needless to say, poverty, hunger and societal meltdown have not prevented idiotic wars involving Tigre, Uganda, Congo, Sudan, Somalia, Eritrea etcetera. Broad brush-strokes, to be sure. But broad brush-strokes are often the way that history paints its gaudier, if more decisive, chapters. Japan, China, Russia, Korea, Poland, Germany, Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia in the 20th century have endured worse broad brush-strokes than almost any part of Africa. They are now - one way or another - virtually all giving aid to or investing in Africa, whereas Africa, with its vast savannah’s and its lush pastures, is giving almost nothing to anyone, apart from AIDS.

Meanwhile, Africa's peoples are outstripping their resources, and causing catastrophic ecological degradation. By 2050, the population of Ethiopia will be 177 million; the equivalent of France, Germany and Benelux today, but located on the parched and increasingly protein-free wastelands of the Great Rift Valley.           

How much sense does it make for us to actively increase the adult population of what is already a vastly over-populated, environmentally devastated and economically dependent country?  How much morality is there in saving an Ethiopian child from starvation today, for it to survive to a life of brutal circumcision, poverty, hunger, violence and sexual abuse, resulting in another half-dozen such wide-eyed children, with comparably jolly little lives ahead of them?
Of course, it might make you feel better
, which is a prime reason for so much charity; but that is not good enough. For self-serving generosity has been one of the curses of Africa. It has sustained political systems which would otherwise have collapsed. 

Oh good: then what?  It prolonged the Eritrean-Ethiopian war by nearly a decade. It is inspiring Bill Gates' program to rid the continent of malaria, when, in the almost complete absence of personal self-discipline, that disease is one of the most efficacious forms of population-control now operating. If his program is successful, tens of millions of children who would otherwise have died in infancy will survive to adulthood, he boasts.

Oh good: then what?
I know, let them all come here (to Ireland) or America, or to Australia.
My thought for today. – Werner
Nothing lasts forever - not even your troubles. Arnold Glasow


Activist said...

As I understand it, if Bill Gates' vaccination program is successful, with it's toxic ingredients (including Polysorbate 80, which is linked to infertility) the population might in fact decline:

Peter S. said...

Hi Werner, rather than a ‘moral conundrum’, it’s much more a disaster caused by short-term ‘do-good’ thinking. Most aid to these countries makes the situation much worse in the medium/longer-term. Vastly better to provide assistance that enable these people to become self-sufficient rather than simplistic ‘save’ the starving, and so looking good on the world stage media. Despicable.

Alex B. said...

Thank you, Werner, for this interesting posting. It is awful what is happening in this world. On the on hand they want to depopulate and then Bill Gates boast to rid the continent of Malaria and save the children, who will never get educated or find work and have to rely on crumbs from foreign aid. They will live a life of misery and hardship. I agree with the sentiment of the “Activist” and Peter S. And, the links from the “Activist” are worth looking at.

Lorraine H. said...

Such an intelligent way of looking at the situation and one I totally agree with Werner.

Barbara said...

WOW! Kevin Meyers has given a very powerful insight into this never-ending problem in Africa. I have to say that I am inclined to agree with him.
Thank you for sharing this.

Errol said...

Werner, you have raised a problem which may well have no solution if we exclude war disease and famine. A question: Was colonialism really so abhorrent as the "carers and sharers" proclaim? When Britain, France, Germany, Portugal and Holland dominated/ruled Africa, the whole continent was well fed, Zimbabwe/Rhodesia was a major producer/exporter and is now a critically failed basket case with a criminally corrupt dictator at its head. And which UN-voting "nation" in Africa is better? South Africa, after all the splendid effort of Mandela, is now little more than crime and disease. Can it be saved?

If the UN were anything more than a well financed sinecure for a bunch of do-nothing bureaucrats, it could probably re-organize Africa's boundaries, forcibly oust the corruption, re-establish productivity and markets and get education going.
That is not going to happen because Marxism is alive and well in this unfortunate world. Yet, as an active practicing Catholic, I am obliged to offer what I can limited though it be and knowing that the result will be as you have pointed out.